A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation - online supplement
نویسنده
چکیده
In the online supplement we present details of additional simulations and results that have been referred to in the main text of the paper. In Appendix 1 we present results of the treatment effect estimates from the Across and Within methods in the simulations of Section 3 when matching is performed with replacement. In Appendix 2 we investigate different applications of propensity scores to estimate treatment effects in the simulations of Section 3. In Appendix 3 we present the results of a logistic regression of treatment assignment on the covariates for the 1306 complete cases in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) data before introduction of missing values.
منابع مشابه
A comparison of two methods of estimating propensity scores after multiple imputation.
In many observational studies, analysts estimate treatment effects using propensity scores, e.g. by matching or sub-classifying on the scores. When some values of the covariates are missing, analysts can use multiple imputation to fill in the missing data, estimate propensity scores based on the m completed datasets, and use the propensity scores to estimate treatment effects. We compare two ap...
متن کاملچند رویکرد برخورد با مقادیر گمشده متغیرهای کمی و بررسی اثر آنها بر نتایج حاصل از یک کارآزمایی بالینی
Background and Objectives: A major challenge that affects the longitudinal studies is the problem of missing data. Missing in the data may result in the loss of part of the information which reduces the accuracy of the estimator and obtain the results will be biased and inaccurate. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the missing data mechanism from a longitudinal research and to consider thi...
متن کاملAn Empirical Comparison of Performance of the Unified Approach to Linearization of Variance Estimation after Imputation with Some Other Methods
Imputation is one of the most common methods to reduce item non_response effects. Imputation results in a complete data set, and then it is possible to use naϊve estimators. After using most of common imputation methods, mean and total (imputation estimators) are still unbiased. However their variances (imputation variances) are underestimated by naϊve variance estimators. Sampling mechanism an...
متن کاملAn approach to impute missing covariates in observational studies when estimating treatment effects with propensity score matching
In many observational studies, researchers estimate treatment effects using propensity score matching techniques. Estimation of propensity scores are complicated when some values of the covariates are missing. We can use multiple imputation to create completed datasets, from which propensity scores can be computed; however, we may be sensitive to the accuracy of the imputation models. We propos...
متن کاملEstimating propensity scores with missing covariate data using general location mixture models.
In many observational studies, analysts estimate causal effects using propensity scores, e.g. by matching, sub-classifying, or inverse probability weighting based on the scores. Estimation of propensity scores is complicated when some values of the covariates are missing. Analysts can use multiple imputation to create completed data sets from which propensity scores can be estimated. We propose...
متن کامل